<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>Question - - Geology - tribe.net</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://geologygeeks.tribe.net/thread/880ce283-0944-4585-97e0-e4ad0cf24f6c?format=atom" />
  <subtitle>Tribe.net. Local Connections</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <title>Re: Question -</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://geologygeeks.tribe.net/thread/880ce283-0944-4585-97e0-e4ad0cf24f6c#1108b6a8-c2ce-414a-b2d3-db56582c4f8f" />
    <author>
      <name>Rhino</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://geologygeeks.tribe.net/thread/880ce283-0944-4585-97e0-e4ad0cf24f6c#1108b6a8-c2ce-414a-b2d3-db56582c4f8f</id>
    <updated>2008-12-31T22:32:22Z</updated>
    <published>2008-12-31T22:32:22Z</published>
    <summary type="html">The pressure of the curve in the spin of the earth is smaller than what it takes.  What causes the magma to erupt upwards is convection currents of molten material in the mantle of the earth that are pushing up after becoming both superpressurized and superheated.  They're in a plastic/liquid state in the mantle, and get pushed up, where they find fault lines, crustal weaknesses, and other weakenesses in the earth's crust, exploit those weaknesses by pushing into them, and push upward and out as lava.&#xD;
&#xD;
It's a process that can take hundreds of thousands of years.&#xD;
&#xD;
We're honored to give you a hand, Plokk.  The professionals and rockhounds both love to talk about the wonder and beauty of the earth.  That's why the rockhounds and professionals are usually pretty good friends.</summary>
    <dc:creator>Rhino</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-31T22:32:22Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Re: Question -</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://geologygeeks.tribe.net/thread/880ce283-0944-4585-97e0-e4ad0cf24f6c#0d806d5c-0778-471b-b5fa-51ad19bdca47" />
    <author>
      <name>Plokk D  Rainbo</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://geologygeeks.tribe.net/thread/880ce283-0944-4585-97e0-e4ad0cf24f6c#0d806d5c-0778-471b-b5fa-51ad19bdca47</id>
    <updated>2008-12-31T22:20:50Z</updated>
    <published>2008-12-31T22:20:50Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Thank you for the link.... the author says to note the curvature of the earth.. yet doesn't explain...  given the rest of the article and that Hawaii is at the end of the chain and closest to the curve  I was wondering if they were considering that the pressure of the curve in the spin of the earth causes the magma to push _________ plate out of the way and erupt....or  I may be way off   lol  in which case tell me to go read some more..&#xD;
&#xD;
&#xD;
and yes thank you for  helping me along.</summary>
    <dc:creator>Plokk D  Rainbo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-31T22:20:50Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Re: Question -</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://geologygeeks.tribe.net/thread/880ce283-0944-4585-97e0-e4ad0cf24f6c#a153d2a1-4c09-4609-b30a-d8bcd8adce2b" />
    <author>
      <name>Rhino</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://geologygeeks.tribe.net/thread/880ce283-0944-4585-97e0-e4ad0cf24f6c#a153d2a1-4c09-4609-b30a-d8bcd8adce2b</id>
    <updated>2008-12-31T21:09:45Z</updated>
    <published>2008-12-31T21:09:45Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Exactly right, Will.  The structural articulations in the crust that absorb or disperse seismic energy include faults and folds, and lest we forget, the degree to which a quake is felt decreases with the root mean square of distance from the epicenter.&#xD;
&#xD;
On Long Valley's caldera, all I've been able to call up right away is sitting on my desktop.  The Continental Consortium for Deep Drilling obtained continuous core from Phase III of the Long Valley Exploratory Well from 7180 to 9831 feet during coring operations there.  From that coring operation (USGS Open File Report 99-158, available on CD ROM.) preliminary stratigraphy of the caldera was determined, and the jury is still out on what causes what. &#xD;
&#xD;
The Yellowstone Hot Spot used to be under Idaho.  From dating of the volcanic deposits there and from deposits at Ash Fall Fossil Beds in Nebraska, it's been determined that there was a major eruption phase in Idaho which blanketed most of the western states with several meters of ash.  Where it hasn't been eroded, it's still visible.  In the Eocene epoch of the Tertiary Period it buried the barrel-chested rhinos at Ash Fall- - they're being excavated today.  The same species, Teleoceras, is also known from the Miocene Gray fossil site in eastern Tennessee that was found by some out-of-state colleagues of mine.&#xD;
&#xD;
For the sake of providing a little more information...the Hawaiian Islands chain hot spot is further defined by a series of former volcanoes that extend into the subsea....these are called the Emperor seamounts.&#xD;
&#xD;
Good discussion, folks!</summary>
    <dc:creator>Rhino</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-31T21:09:45Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Re: Question -</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://geologygeeks.tribe.net/thread/880ce283-0944-4585-97e0-e4ad0cf24f6c#a777f01b-d5a1-4e05-822e-9f141234bb07" />
    <author>
      <name>Snowlover</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://geologygeeks.tribe.net/thread/880ce283-0944-4585-97e0-e4ad0cf24f6c#a777f01b-d5a1-4e05-822e-9f141234bb07</id>
    <updated>2008-12-31T20:47:25Z</updated>
    <published>2008-12-31T20:47:25Z</published>
    <summary type="html">here's a brief explanation of hot spots from the USGS&#xD;
http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/dynamic/hotspots.html&#xD;
&#xD;
Just beacuse quakes occur at similar times doesn't necessarily mean they are related.</summary>
    <dc:creator>Snowlover</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-31T20:47:25Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Re: Question -</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://geologygeeks.tribe.net/thread/880ce283-0944-4585-97e0-e4ad0cf24f6c#24e914ae-4edf-4739-8575-93bec1cb9caf" />
    <author>
      <name>Plokk D  Rainbo</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://geologygeeks.tribe.net/thread/880ce283-0944-4585-97e0-e4ad0cf24f6c#24e914ae-4edf-4739-8575-93bec1cb9caf</id>
    <updated>2008-12-31T19:57:55Z</updated>
    <published>2008-12-31T19:57:55Z</published>
    <summary type="html">mantle upwelling&#xD;
&#xD;
like a pot of boiling water?  the bubble is pushing the bottom of the lake?</summary>
    <dc:creator>Plokk D  Rainbo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-31T19:57:55Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Re: Question -</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://geologygeeks.tribe.net/thread/880ce283-0944-4585-97e0-e4ad0cf24f6c#8ce8cbf7-75d0-47d8-8819-fab106c6596a" />
    <author>
      <name>Will The Dancer</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://geologygeeks.tribe.net/thread/880ce283-0944-4585-97e0-e4ad0cf24f6c#8ce8cbf7-75d0-47d8-8819-fab106c6596a</id>
    <updated>2008-12-31T17:48:54Z</updated>
    <published>2008-12-31T17:48:54Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Highly unlikely, as there are many structural articulations in the crust that would absorb seismic energy, otherwise, a quake in Indiana would be felt across the continent as if it happened in one's own backyard. Mostly, local events impact local stresses.&#xD;
&#xD;
There are some indications that the 2002 Denali event did trigger some small scale activity in the Long Valley Caldera. Sorry, I do not have the link to the article on tap, but I read it somewhere.&#xD;
&#xD;
Rhino is right on the money about Yellowstone. I have been enjoying some of the spirited debate over the existence of mantle plumes, but I do think that defines Yellowstone, and the Hawaiian chain.&#xD;
&#xD;
BTW Mantle Plume=Hot Spot.</summary>
    <dc:creator>Will The Dancer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-31T17:48:54Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Re: Question -</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://geologygeeks.tribe.net/thread/880ce283-0944-4585-97e0-e4ad0cf24f6c#391ae1c9-2338-4038-870b-db350de6541c" />
    <author>
      <name>Plokk D  Rainbo</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://geologygeeks.tribe.net/thread/880ce283-0944-4585-97e0-e4ad0cf24f6c#391ae1c9-2338-4038-870b-db350de6541c</id>
    <updated>2008-12-31T17:21:10Z</updated>
    <published>2008-12-31T17:21:10Z</published>
    <summary type="html">by hot spot your referring to the underlying magma which helps fuel the geysers ?   and now I get the reference to volcanic activity.  &#xD;
&#xD;
Ok I'm not a geologist nor do I play one on the internet.. :)  I took some basic courses in college as needed for a degree in ornamental horticulture.   So I'm familiar with aquifers and some land formations... my grandfather was a rock hound and Rhino suggested I come here.. thanks Rhino...  &#xD;
&#xD;
anyway just before the China quakes there was a small event near Evansville Indiana  which is what made me question whether the swarm in Yellowstone could be a precursor to a coming event.</summary>
    <dc:creator>Plokk D  Rainbo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-31T17:21:10Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Re: Question -</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://geologygeeks.tribe.net/thread/880ce283-0944-4585-97e0-e4ad0cf24f6c#4cd93ec0-6f0f-4dfb-8d0c-d13fe7138323" />
    <author>
      <name>Rhino</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://geologygeeks.tribe.net/thread/880ce283-0944-4585-97e0-e4ad0cf24f6c#4cd93ec0-6f0f-4dfb-8d0c-d13fe7138323</id>
    <updated>2008-12-31T16:10:57Z</updated>
    <published>2008-12-31T16:10:57Z</published>
    <summary type="html">My feeling is that the two would occur independent of each other.  You see, Yellowstone is a "hot spot", or a continental crust, part of the North American plate, that's overriding a mantle upwelling.  These are magmatically induced quakes, whereas the ones at plate boundaries are frictionally induced, when plates meet each other or when they spread apart, or when they slide past each other.</summary>
    <dc:creator>Rhino</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-31T16:10:57Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Question -</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://geologygeeks.tribe.net/thread/880ce283-0944-4585-97e0-e4ad0cf24f6c#009769f8-cf07-472b-8157-809a4cdd9d02" />
    <author>
      <name>Plokk D  Rainbo</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://geologygeeks.tribe.net/thread/880ce283-0944-4585-97e0-e4ad0cf24f6c#009769f8-cf07-472b-8157-809a4cdd9d02</id>
    <updated>2008-12-31T01:55:29Z</updated>
    <published>2008-12-31T01:54:06Z</published>
    <summary type="html">I became interested in watching the earthquake movements when I started  looking at Google earth, it shows fault lines and earthquakes  then I added the widget on my g mail homepage  so I watched the earthquakes build and release in China.. there is still alot of energy around the inner edge of the continents shown here http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/qed/  &#xD;
&#xD;
With the current event (swarm) in Yellowstone , which is in the middle of the continent occurring is it more likely to have a larger event  along the faults?  to release the pressure?  Can you explain if  yes or no?</summary>
    <dc:creator>Plokk D  Rainbo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-31T01:54:06Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>



